The table of contents must list, with page numbers, all chapters, sections and subsections, the list of references, bibliography, list of abbreviations and appendices. The list of tables and illustrations should follow the table of contents, listing with page numbers the tables, photographs, diagrams, etc., in the order in which they appear in the text.
Firstly, as far as I can tell the chapter divisions themselves arelater,and the titles placed there were extracted from the summaries at the front ofeach book (this can be seen from book 1, where the numbering in the summaries atthe front does not correspond to the divisions in the text). As such, the assignment of wording to a given chapter is thework of a late-antique or medieval scribe. This leaves us with the summaries at thestart of the book. However, the wording in the summary, if the summary follows the order of thecontents, would seem to refer to this section of the body of the textanyway.
There is a rare newspaper account of a skirmish that occurred on the 1st of November, 1876 at a place called Creen Creek. This only exists because of an unusual chain of events:
Your essays for a course assignment will probablynot be published, but genuine scientific writing will be, and thesubject of your paper may very well come across your work eventually.
A local settler would never have discussed the event with outsiders because of the 'code of the frontier', under which a blanket of silence was thrown over frontier atrocities and akirmishes. This fight was not only the subject of a newspaper article; it was accompanied by an illustration, based on information supplied by the traveller, that shows him on the ground after his horse was killed, and the skirmish in the background. It continued for another ten minute or so until the warriors were 'dispersed'. Two troopers were wounded. The illustration can be viewed on Wikipedia.
One clue that your writing needs better transitions is if you findthat you can cut and paste paragraphs from one section to anotherwithout doing substantial rewriting of how the paragraph begins andends.
Important Note: The reveal formatting pane above demonstrates a between Word and many other programs. That is the use of paragraph to change the distance from the left and right edge of the paper rather than changing . More on this .
Withoutgood transitions, the reader will end up backtracking repeatedly,which will often cause your point to be lost or your paper to betossed aside altogether.
Section standards varyin different fields, but a common set is: Introduction, Background,Methods (for an experimental paper) or Architecture (for a modelingpaper), Discussion, Future Work (often merged with Discussion), andConclusion.
Forinstance, a section about adding a second eye to a simulation ofsingle-eye vision could truthfully be called "Multiple eyes", but thattitle is meaningless to someone scanning the document.
Instead, itshould be something like "Extending the model to explain stereovision" whose meaning will be clear to the type of person likely to bereading the paper.
Each 1.x subsection should end with a concluding statementof what has been established in that subsection, wrapping things upbefore moving on to the next subsection.
For instance, in 1873 a large party of miners – cccompanied by a Native Mounted Police section – on its way to the Palmer river gold diggings in Queensland was attacked at first light whilst encamped by as many as 500 local tribesmen. The group had taken precautions against such an assault by erecting a barricade composed of boxes and saddles. The Aborigines very nearly pulled off a surprise attack, but the prosepctors were alerted just in time to prepare an adequate defence.
I dug out my copy of Henry Reynold's 'Dispossession', in which the Creen Creek illustration and accompanying newspaper text appear. To correct the post above, apparently a large number of Aborigines were holding a place called Bora Bora (and before you suggest it no, there was no tunnel system) near Creen Creek and had attacked the telegraph station. Two NMP sections under sub-Inspectors Armit and Poyngdestre attacked them, leading to a fight that lasted 'a considerable time'. The traveller was merely unhorsed; it was Armit's horse that was killed.
Often you will find that "it" or "they" refers tosomething vague that was not even discussed explicitly in your paper,in which case you should reword your text entirely.